Vocabulary Web 1
Vocabulary Web 2
Previously, Jem and Scout have both been depicted with juvenile characteristics. However, Jem underwent a metamorphosis in a short period of time and gained a level of maturity described by Scout as a “maddening air of wisdom,” (Lee 155). As the hysteria leading up to the trial mounts, Jem begins to apprehend the weight of the Tom Robinson trial. At one point Jem cautions Scout to mind Aunt Alexandria. Scout, at this point, is not developed enough to understand what Jem has concluded, that Atticus is encumbered with his duty regarding the trial and frivolous quarrels are more inapposite than ever. The preeminent difference between Jem and Scout is that Jem understands (or has at least embarked on the path to understanding) while Scout observes, taking cues from Atticus, Jem, Calpurnia and others.
Scout remains a child. She is irked by Jem’s new unwillingness to play games, and his eagerness to tell her what to do and how to behave. One change that Scout notes in Jem is his motivation for sharing information with her, saying “formerly [it was] because he thought I’d like it; now, for my edification and instruction,” (Lee 184). Scout does not understand the extent of the fury evoked in the citizens of Maycomb and surrounding communities concerning the trial. An instance where this is clearly seen is when Jem, Scout and Dill follow their father one night. From a distance, the three children observe a group of men draw nearer to Atticus. Scout dashes to her father, ignoring Jem urging her to stop. Scout quickly realises that she has hastened into a crowd of strangers. Ignorant to the perilous nature of the situation, Scout strikes up an amiable conversation with Mr. Cunningham. This is a blatant display of her naivety and shows that she does not see the noxious disposition brought out in people when race is involved. Since Scout is the narrator the story, it is important that she remains impartial, allowing the readers to reach conclusions of their own.
Works Cited:
Lee, Harper. To Kill a Mockingbird. New York: Grand Central, 2010. Print.
The first bird in the picture represents Atticus. Atticus is feverishly trying to represent Tom Robinson but no matter how hard he tries people are unwilling to listen. The second bird represents the majority of the white community, as they are unwilling to hear what Atticus has to say and how they loudly express their condemnation of Tom Robinson, despite the lack of evidence. The gap between the two birds shows the separation between those who support Atticus and his doings and those who do not approve.
Be careful to stay in the same tense throughout a piece of work.Your writing changes from past tense, to present tense, then back to past tense. This can be avoided via editing.
ReplyDeleteMore elaboration on the significance of events to the entirety of the book could be beneficial to build on you paragraphs. You can also try to connect your ideas to other themes presented in the novel.
Good use of quotes and in text citations. The webs are fairly detailed.
You have adapted the visual to the novel quite well and have shown new insight into the situations presented.
• Is the writer clear? Is the hamburger structure used?
ReplyDeleteThe writing is extremely clear and the writer uses a wide range of colourful vocabulary. The hamburger model was used and proved effective.
• Is there specific support provided?
There are some feelings in the texted, but I would add more of the character reactions to your response.
There are good examples of events that happen in the book.
• Are quotes used and are they used effectively?
Yes, there are two quotes in the paragraphs and both are well placed into the writing.
Both quotes are good examples of what the writer is trying to get across.
• Does the writer focus on the main events of the chapter?
Yes, the writer does focus on important sections in the novel, but both paragraphs are similar. Perhaps next time you might want to chose two more contrasting points. Also you might want to talk about the trial.
• Does the writer connect to a bigger picture?
Yes, the writer does. You can tell throughout the writing that the writer has a clear understanding of the bigger pictures in the text.
• Webs?
All of the webs are completed and are done to a very high standard.
• Was the representation thought provoking?
Yes, I really enjoyed the representation.
I really enjoyed the writer’s wide range of vocabulary and imaginative writing style.
The photo that the writer chose was appropriate and visual interesting to look at.
The writer shows an amazing understanding of the depth of the photo and uses it to their advantage.